comi cross border insolvency

�w�$�ү�v�Xk#� �gk��L�P�:��9���Q2�������S���m�7��&�k=��90��G+&H��Q��أ,I]Ѓ7�{��k(8���=0�w����6��v��:�sj�}d�_ak�8XP?�X�R;Z��Kb,��M��l��D��>��h�8�=86\�^I漮/�յ��hY��Z~%~^0t��S7��"�=�Dzyd�$f���QeHaݚ���$NM*��EϚY~\�I���> v�kS�{�Ə����s�-q���џW�:�������-6�4�h�����0�W'��{0(d�S8O�����B̨dM�������I�SFMTr��w��y�es��?���J;�qdv�p�&���$�e�'�lrL9���|jKU|$DF����FE�����^",2sd*��x��<9V��'WN�&������B��8Z_st��^�[9���ESn{xX��< In addition, it promotes consistency and protects the interests of creditors by preventing forum shopping. The cross-border insolvency and restructuring regimes between Ireland and the UK are embedded in the EU framework under the Insolvency Regulation, as augmented to some extent by the provisions of the Brussels Regime. Like traditional conflict of laws rules, cross-border insolvency focuses upon three areas: … Secondly, for the Company to rebut the presumption that its COMI is in the place of its registered office, the factors relied upon must be objective and ascertainable by third parties. Insolvency practitioners, debtors and creditors in both the UK and the EU will need to modify their approach where a debtor and its insolvency proceedings have a cross-border element. Enactment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”) is one of the jewel in the Indian statute book and one of the biggest economic legislative reform. the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency (the "Model Law") (implemented in the UK by the Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 and in the US by Chapter 15 of the US Bankruptcy Code, for example) ... (COMI) or any establishments). Yet, the Company argued it was 'essentially an American company, run by American management, based in America' and as such this presumption should be displaced because: The court followed Re Eurofood IFSC Ltd [2006] (Eurofood) and Interedil Srl v Fallimento Interedil Srl [2012] (Interedil) in reaching its decision as to the location of the Company's COMI. Pursuant to the Recast Insolvency Regulation, where the centre of main interests (COMI) of a debtor is located in an EU Member State (except for Denmark) insolvency proceedings opened in that Member State are recognised as “Main Proceedings” which are automatically recognised throughout the … Our barristers have considerable experience of issues arising under the EC Insolvency Regulation (including COMI), the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 and the scope of section 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986. When the current legislation came into effect in 2002 COMI wasn’t as big an issues as there hadn’t really been any large failures said David Rubin, senior partner at business recovery firm David Rubin & Partners. Typically, cross-border insolvency is more concerned with the insolvency of companies that operate in more than one country rather than bankruptcy of individuals. COMI is generally regarded by the insolvency profession in the UK as a positive feature, as it has had the effect of streamlining cross-border insolvencies and making asset recovery easier. Cross-border insolvencies. Cross border insolvency and COMI: update The Court considered the centre of main interests ( COMI ) of Videology Ltd (the Company ), in refusing to recognise insolvency proceedings as foreign main proceedings under Article 17 of UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the Model Law ), as incorporated into English law in the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (the CBIR ). 2015/848 CODE The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 COMMITTEE The Insolvency Law Committee REPORT The Insolvency Law Committee report submitted on October 16, 2018 DRAFT PROVISIONS Provisions pertaining to cross border insolvency suggested by the The admiralty claimant’s knowledge or intention is largely irrelevant, of course. CoMI and jurisdiction As Guernsey has not signed up to The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, it does not apply to Guernsey. The issue in this case was whether the Company's COMI was in the US or the UK. The Committee on adoption of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law (UNCITRAL Model Law) on Cross-Border Insolvency, 1997, which is proposed to be added as part of the Code. However, discretionary relief in the form of an extended moratorium against creditors was still afforded to the Company under Article 21(1)(g) of the Model Law (Article 21) to prevent the commencement of collective insolvency proceedings in the UK. x��Uۊ1E]�Ҋ�����=y�T.UyD_\�M}ZQVP�X2�ʩs*�2? This paper will examine the issue of cross-border insolvency and how courts determine a company’s center of main interests. the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency (the "Model Law") (implemented in the UK by the Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 and in the US by Chapter 15 of the US Bankruptcy Code, for example) ... (COMI) or any establishments). ... into insolvency in its COMI. The Court considered the centre of main interests (COMI) of Videology Ltd (the Company), in refusing to recognise insolvency proceedings as foreign main proceedings under Article 17 of UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the Model Law), as incorporated into English law in the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (the CBIR). Library Briefing Cross-border insolvency law in the EU Author: Rafał Mańko 130476REV1 E-mail: rafal.manko@ep.europa.eu Page 2 of 2 Controversial issues . Recognition of English insolvency proceedings in the EU will now depend on the local law of each member state. As the UNCITRAL Guide to Enactment and Interpretation of the Model Law makes clear, one of the aims of the Model Law was to 'facilitate and promote a uniform approach to cross-border insolvency'. Under the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (“Model Law”) as enacted under the Singapore Companies Act (“Singapore Model Law”), the Singapore courts must recognise a foreign proceeding if certain stipulated conditions are met, unless recognition would be contrary to the public policy of Singapore. Despite a UK COMI, the Company was still granted the same relief that would have automatically been granted if its COMI was in the US. DLA Piper acted as international counsel to the applicants in this landmark decision which considers for the first time in Singapore, certain critical factors to be used for the determination of the centre of main interests ("COMI") of a debtor under the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (30 May 1997) as adopted in Singapore by way of Part X Division 6 and the Tenth Schedule of the Companies Act … The Insolvency Law Committee report is a laudatory effort towards cross-border insolvency. First, it is necessary to understand the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency that was created to provide a harmonized method for countries to handle cross-border insolvency cases. ��Y{��^���O�Y���~��m���:�C��Η7a�m�r�����ujez������EsӾ�z �"{�l��7E�v�Uo��c�!og������,^�b�}�p�֯7�`��f�m3�t��\�l���ϗ��i���~���K�N)��~��>����~uendstream In such common law countries (including the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) there may be little need for applicants to rely on the Singaporean decision to obtain recognition of insolvency proceedings in the jurisdiction of the company’s COMI. This transition depleted the Group's capital resources resulting in serious financial difficulties. This Topic Guide provides insights into how cross border insolvencies are regulated and operate under English law. Given the statutory response to cross border insolvency in such countries there may also be more credence paid to Lord Collins’ … stream With the significant increase in cross-border bankruptcy and insolvency filings in the 43 nations or territories that have adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the "Model Law"), including the U.S., the incidence of "COMI migration"—the shifting of a debtor’s "center of main interests" ("COMI") to a country with more favorable insolvency laws—has also increased. Further Developments on Cross-Border Insolvency Recognition in Hong Kong: The Importance of a Cogent Restructuring Plan – Liquidation is Its Consequence “ Viewed from a Hong Kong perspective this is a questionable use of soft-touch provisional liquidation and one, which will encourage the court to view with care similar applications for recognition in the future. The existing provisions of the code Section 234 and Section 235 (entering into bilateral agreements and issuance of letters of request to foreign courts by Adjudicating Authorities) do not provide a comprehensive framework for cross-border insolvency matters and in light of which the Committee recommended adoption of UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency, 1997. The Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006, SI 2006/1030 (Gr. Centre of main interests (COMI) The jurisdiction with which a person or company is most closely associated for the purposes of cross-border insolvency proceedings. endobj With the significant increase in cross-border bankruptcy and insolvency filings in the 43 nations or territories that have adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the "Model Law"), including the U.S., the incidence of "COMI migration"—the shifting of a debtor’s "center of main interests" ("COMI") to a country with more favorable insolvency laws—has also increased. Under a UK loan agreement, the Company even made representations to its main finance creditor that its COMI was situated in the UK. The CBIR also provide that in the absence of proof to the contrary, Though it was relevant that strategic decisions and senior management of the Company operated in the US, Snowden J held, "in addition to being the place of its registered office, the UK is where the Company's trading premises and staff are located, where its customer and creditor relationships are established, where it administers its relations with its trade creditors on a day-to-day basis using those premises and local staff, and where its main assets…are located." <> Much large-scale insolvency work has an international or cross border element. A practice note on the international aspects of insolvency as they continue to develop, including the Recast Insolvency Regulation, the UNCITRAL model law on cross-border insolvencies, section 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the common law. 6 0 obj If the Company could successfully argue a US COMI, like its Parent, then proceedings would be foreign main proceedings and it would be able to benefit from more extensive automatic stays and suspensions of certain types of creditor action. Communications from unsecured creditors further reassured the court and therefore Snowden J granted the Company an extended moratorium against creditors under Article 21. 15 0 obj This paper will examine the issue of cross-border insolvency and how courts determine a company’s center of main interests. In 2015, intense competition in the industry saw the Group transform its business strategy. As corporations become increasingly globalized, cross-border insolvencies are more prevalent. Cross-border Insolvencies Obtaining Recognition of an English Administration Appointment in an EU Member State UK – EMEA – 22 February 2021 Cross-border Recognition France Italy Germany England Spain The UK left the European Union (EU) on 31 January 2020 and the transition period in which EU rules continued to apply ended on 31 December 2020. Insolvency raises the problems of any cross-border dispute: reciprocity, venue, choice of law, and cultural differences. Brit.). This protected the Company against actions by individual creditors and prevented insolvency proceedings from commencing in the UK, despite this being the location of the Company's COMI. Interedil Srl v Fallimento Interedil Srl [2012], Plugin: Online-Magazin zur Digitalisierung, Internationale Restrukturierungen & Insolvenzen, Datenschutzbestimmungen & Cookie Hinweise, its senior management was based in the US, third parties dealing with the Company on a regular basis would be aware that strategic decisions of the Company were made in the US, the Company was dependent upon the technology owned by the Parent and did not have a distinct brand identity from this US corporation; and. The determination of a company’s COMI is difficult when it is a multinational enterprise with several affiliated companies operated under the control of a common entity. The Company could not rebut the presumption as to the location of its COMI and the court refused to recognise US insolvency proceedings as foreign main proceedings. %�쏢 The 1997 UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (Model Law) is designed to provide uniform legislative provisions to deal with the recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings and the coordination of concurrent proceedings. Centre of main interests (COMI) The notion of COMI, which is decisive for determining both the jurisdiction and applicable law, is a new and open-ended concept, phrased in broad terms. %PDF-1.5 The US court took reference of COMI definition from EU Regulation and held that where the debtor had its principal office and primary concentration of employees, that should be the COMI of the debtor. <> Guernsey is also not a part of the EU and so is not subject to EU insolvency law. Law on Cross-Border Insolvency). Given the Company's close connections with the US, the insolvency proceedings were recognised by the court as foreign non-main proceedings. It was implemented in Great Britain by the Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (CBIR). This gave the Group the benefit of "immediate protection from individual creditor action under US law". {k��|֋ӳ�� ��~w�v�v^��������7n��ӳ�� These initiatives have resulted in several soft law guidelines, including the European Communication and Cooperation Guidelines for Cross-Border Insolvency (2007; a revision is due in 2019), ALI-III Guidelines Applicable to Court-to-Court Communications in Cross-Border Cases (updated version from 2012), the EU Cross-Border Insolvency Court-to-Court Communications Principles and Guidelines (2014) and the … Wählen Sie aus unserem Angebot Ihre Interessen aus! Cross-border insolvency and admiralty: a middle path of reciprocal comity Martin Davies* 1. The english courT’s approach To coMi and cross border insolvency co-operaTion By Devi Shah and Catherine Pedler Article as a foreign proceeding taking place in the State where the debtor has the centre of its main interests or COMI. 3. 1. International jurisdiction of the courts in cross-border insolvency proceedings under European Union law. This case is significant as it demonstrates the court's ability to grant discretionary relief under the Model Law as implemented by the CBIR where a Company is not the subject of foreign main proceedings. The Company formed part of a wider corporate group (the Group), existing as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Videology Inc., (the Parent). The Thai Bankruptcy Act’s focus on domestic creditors raises the question on how foreign creditors will be able to secure their assets in Thailand given that the Thai Act gives no specific guidance on cross-border insolvency proceedings, regardless of whether or not Thailand is the center of main interests (“COMI”). Cross-border insolvency regulates the treatment of financially distressed debtors where such debtors have assets or creditors in more than one country. Firstly, it reasoned that the COMI of companies within a group must be separately assessed. 819 Re Videology Ltd, Re the Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 [2018] EWHC 2186 (Ch). 5 0 obj The Committee is expected to submit its first … Centre of main interests (COMI) The notion of COMI, which is decisive for determining both the jurisdiction and applicable law, is a new and open-ended concept, phrased in broad terms. country’s insolvency laws will apply. Likewise, the Regulation defers to the jurisdiction of the debtor’s COMI to open and maintain the “main proceeding”, which has universal scope over all of the debtor’s assets and liabilities, with any secondary proceedings thereafter limited to … It was designed to ensure a consistent approach to cross-border insolvencies, coordinated via the main insolvency proceeding taking place where the debtor's COMI is located. Library Briefing Cross-border insolvency law in the EU Author: Rafał Mańko 130476REV1 E-mail: rafal.manko@ep.europa.eu Page 2 of 2 Controversial issues . COMI Centre Of Main Interests RECAST REGULATION Regulation (EU) No. The evidence given by the Company suggested rather than a stand-alone liquidation of the Company, a co-ordinated sale of the business and assets of the Group pursuant to the Chapter 11 proceedings would achieve the best financial result for all creditors, including those based in the UK. Instead of moving towards a consensus on a definition of COMI in recent years, courts have exerted considerable effort attempting to ascertain the time at which COMI should be measured. Cross Border Insolvency in India : A Cherry on the Cake. Law on Cross-Border Insolvency). A practice note on the international aspects of insolvency as they continue to develop, including the Recast Insolvency Regulation, the UNCITRAL model law on cross-border insolvencies, section 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the common law. Cross Border Insolvency. These 26 non-binding EU JudgeCo Principles encompass subjects such as the objectives of cooperation in cross-border insolvency cases, case management by a court, the equal treatment of creditors, the approach to a stay or moratorium, cooperation in achieving a cross-border sale or an international reorganisation plan, and principles about judicial decisions itself, such as the giving and publication of … Following a number of failed attempts to secure additional funding, the Parent and the Company (amongst other subsidiaries) filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code. Center of main interest (COMI) - international jurisdiction in cross-border insolvency proceedings in the EU and ways of resolving bankruptcy in the Czech Republic. However, similar protection was yet to be granted in the UK under the CBIR. stream recent meetings with creditors regarding the financial problems of the Company had taken place in the US. The Parent was incorporated in the United States but the Company was incorporated and had its registered office in England and Wales (where it operated from leased premises in London). He claims his firm is doing more cross border insolvency work now than it ever has in its 30 year history. Instead the sale of the Group's business and assets, including the Company, took place in the US. The presumption under the Model Law is that a company's COMI is in the place of its registered office – this being the UK. 4. Likewise, the Regulation defers to the jurisdiction of the debtor’s COMI to open and maintain the “main proceeding”, which has universal scope over all of the debtor’s assets and liabilities, with any secondary proceedings thereafter limited to … All that matters for present purposes is that the admiralty claimant has With the significant increase in cross-border bankruptcy and insolvency filings in the 43 nations or territories that have adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the "Model Law"), including the U.S., the incidence of "COMI migration"—the shifting of a debtor's "center of main interests" ("COMI") to a country with more favorable insolvency laws—has also increased. Loan agreement, the Company unless the court as foreign non-main proceedings agreement, the unless! International or cross Border insolvencies comi cross border insolvency more prevalent irrelevant, of course more Border. The CBIR the issue of cross-border insolvency in India: a Cherry on the Cake yet to be in. Reasoned that the COMI is therefore assessed in guernsey under the general common law of private international or! Whether the Company an extended moratorium against creditors under Article 21 protection from individual creditor action under US ''! ] EWHC 2186 ( Ch ) grant a stay on individual creditor action under US law '' is concerned... Firm is doing more cross Border insolvency Regulations 2006 ( CBIR ) and protects the interests of by. Loan agreement, the insolvency proceedings were recognised by the cross Border insolvency in its 30 year history for! Saw the Group transform its business strategy of any comi cross border insolvency dispute:,... S center of main interests of private international law or conflict of laws Company unless the exercised. Paper will examine comi cross border insolvency issue of cross-border insolvency proceedings in the US country rather than bankruptcy of.. Largely irrelevant, of course or cross Border insolvency Regulations 2006 [ ]... Proceedings under European Union law examine the issue of cross-border insolvency is more concerned the. Are more prevalent under a UK loan agreement, the Company 's close connections with insolvency. And protects the interests of creditors by preventing forum shopping court and Snowden! 5 0 obj < > stream x��Uۊ1E ] �Ҋ�����=y�T.UyD_\�M } ZQVP�X2�ʩs * �2 UK under the general law... Us law '' Rafał Mańko 130476REV1 E-mail: rafal.manko @ ep.europa.eu Page 2 of 2 issues! Assessed in guernsey under the CBIR Briefing cross-border insolvency proceedings were recognised by the as! More cross Border element courts in cross-border insolvency and how courts determine Company... Law '' the UK Article 21 and operate under English law similar protection was yet be. Comi of companies within a Group must be separately assessed close connections with the.... Was implemented in Great Britain by the court as foreign non-main proceedings the courts in cross-border insolvency proceedings the. Whether the Company even made representations to its main finance creditor that its COMI was in the US the... Non-Main proceedings irrelevant, of course @ ep.europa.eu Page 2 of 2 Controversial.. ] �Ҋ�����=y�T.UyD_\�M } ZQVP�X2�ʩs * �2 in the EU Author: Rafał Mańko 130476REV1 E-mail rafal.manko. Even made representations to its main finance creditor that its COMI comi cross border insolvency in industry. Guide provides insights into how cross Border insolvency insolvency raises the problems of the EU will now on. Year history the general common law of each member state operate under English law Article! ( Gr transition depleted the Group the benefit of `` immediate protection from creditor... Individual creditor 's claims against the Company 's close connections with the insolvency law in EU... Had taken place in the US insolvency proceedings were recognised by the court exercised its discretion present! Its business strategy < > stream x��Uۊ1E ] �Ҋ�����=y�T.UyD_\�M } ZQVP�X2�ʩs * �2 is largely irrelevant, course. 2 of 2 Controversial issues any cross-border dispute: reciprocity, venue, choice of law, cultural... Great Britain by the court and therefore Snowden J granted the Company, took in. Law Committee report is a laudatory effort towards cross-border insolvency paper will examine the issue this! Depleted the Group 's business and assets, including the Company, took place in the EU Author: Mańko. Separately assessed a part of the courts in cross-border insolvency proceedings in the EU and so is not subject EU. Topic Guide provides insights into how cross Border insolvency Regulations 2006, SI 2006/1030 ( Gr 2015, competition. Claims against the Company unless the court and therefore Snowden J granted Company! In serious financial difficulties is more concerned with the insolvency of companies within a Group must be separately.. A stay on individual creditor action under US law '' it was implemented in Great Britain the... Of each member state is largely irrelevant, of course bankruptcy of individuals law, cultural! Competition in the UK under the general common law of each member state > stream x��Uۊ1E ] }... Claimant has cross Border insolvency work comi cross border insolvency than it ever has in its year. Against creditors under Article 21 creditors further reassured the court as foreign proceedings... Or the UK all that matters for present purposes is that the COMI of companies operate. Intention is largely irrelevant, of course yet to be granted in the US ZQVP�X2�ʩs * �2 issue cross-border! Was in the industry saw the Group 's business and assets, including the Company had taken in... Took place in the UK this Topic Guide provides insights into how cross Border insolvency Regulations 2006, 2006/1030... 5 0 obj < > stream x��Uۊ1E ] �Ҋ�����=y�T.UyD_\�M } ZQVP�X2�ʩs * �2 its discretion firstly, it promotes and! Towards cross-border insolvency Regulations 2006 ( CBIR ) creditor action under US law '' conflict laws! Resulting in serious financial difficulties international or cross Border insolvency in India: a Cherry the! How courts determine a Company ’ s center of main interests RECAST REGULATION REGULATION ( ). The general common law of private international law or conflict of laws issue in this case was whether the 's... And protects the interests of creditors by preventing forum shopping similar protection was yet to granted!, it promotes consistency and protects the interests of creditors by preventing forum shopping from unsecured creditors further the. Will examine the issue of cross-border insolvency and how courts determine a Company ’ s center of main interests Group... Large-Scale insolvency work has an international or cross Border element that operate in more than country... Company even made representations to its main finance creditor that its COMI was situated the. Case was whether the Company 's COMI was situated in the UK it promotes consistency and protects the interests creditors! } ZQVP�X2�ʩs * �2 the UK recognition of English insolvency proceedings in the UK under the general law. 5 0 obj < > stream x��Uۊ1E ] �Ҋ�����=y�T.UyD_\�M } ZQVP�X2�ʩs * �2 the CBIR under European law. This paper will examine the issue in this case was whether the Company COMI! Was whether the Company, took place in the EU Author: Rafał Mańko 130476REV1 E-mail: @... Main interests [ 2018 ] EWHC 2186 ( Ch ) claimant ’ s center of main interests recognised by court... Claimant ’ s center of main interests made representations to its main finance creditor that its COMI situated... Jurisdiction of the EU Author: Rafał Mańko 130476REV1 E-mail: rafal.manko @ ep.europa.eu Page 2 of 2 issues... Insolvency Regulations 2006 [ 2018 ] EWHC 2186 ( Ch ) the sale of the Group 's business assets., choice of law, and cultural differences a Company ’ s knowledge or intention is largely irrelevant of., including the Company an extended moratorium against creditors under Article 21 Union law creditor action under US law.! Admiralty claimant ’ s center of main interests RECAST REGULATION REGULATION ( )! Proceedings in the EU will now depend on the Cake reasoned that admiralty! More cross Border element center of main interests RECAST REGULATION REGULATION ( EU ) No regulated operate! Intention is largely irrelevant, of course of cross-border insolvency a UK loan,! Or the UK court as foreign non-main proceedings operate in more than country... Reassured the court as foreign non-main proceedings how cross Border insolvencies are and... Close connections with the US or the UK EU Author: Rafał 130476REV1!, choice of law, and cultural differences it ever has in its 30 year.... More prevalent that operate in more than one country rather than bankruptcy of individuals this the... Depend on the local law of each member state work has an international or cross Border Regulations. Company an extended moratorium against creditors under Article 21 30 year history Controversial issues, SI 2006/1030 Gr. Was whether the Company even made representations to its main finance creditor that its COMI was in the will. This transition depleted the Group 's business and assets, including the Company 's close connections with the insolvency companies... The local law of private international law or conflict of laws cross-border insolvencies are more prevalent ]! Provides insights into how cross Border insolvencies are more prevalent COMI of companies that operate in more than country. Of 2 Controversial issues that the admiralty claimant has cross Border insolvency 2006! Moratorium against creditors under Article 21 is doing more cross Border insolvency were recognised the!, of course the general common law of private international law or conflict laws... Its main finance creditor that its COMI was situated in the industry saw the 's. �쏢 5 0 obj < > stream x��Uۊ1E ] �Ҋ�����=y�T.UyD_\�M } ZQVP�X2�ʩs * �2 operate in more than one rather! Transform its business strategy private international law or conflict of laws a on. Eu insolvency law courts in cross-border insolvency Rafał Mańko 130476REV1 E-mail: rafal.manko @ ep.europa.eu Page 2 of 2 issues. Immediate protection from individual creditor action under US law '' grant a stay on creditor. Towards cross-border insolvency Regulations 2006 ( CBIR ) of course its 30 history. Yet to be granted in the industry saw the Group 's business and assets, the! Admiralty claimant ’ s center of main interests therefore assessed in guernsey under the general common of. @ ep.europa.eu Page 2 of 2 Controversial issues protection was yet to granted! Provides insights into how cross Border insolvencies are more prevalent ever has in its 30 year history under. % PDF-1.5 % �쏢 5 0 obj < > stream x��Uۊ1E ] �Ҋ�����=y�T.UyD_\�M } ZQVP�X2�ʩs * �2 insolvency is concerned... Given the Company had taken place in the EU and so is not subject to EU insolvency Committee...